Southworth PC | Attorneys For Federal Employees
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Careers at Southworth PC
    • Our Mission, Values & Story
    • Shaun Southworth, Esq.
    • Lydia Taylor, Esq.
    • Ayesha Cotton, Esq.
    • Kaitlin Grant, Esq.
    • LaShanda Thompson, Esq.
    • Mark E. Attucks Sr., Esq.
    • Michael Royster, Esq.
    • Naseam Jabberi, Esq.
    • Octavia Crumpton, Esq.
    • Sadarie Hines-Mahens, Esq.
    • Tatiana Cooley, Esq.
    • Traci McCoy, Esq.
    • Abby Conine
    • Jessica Gregoire
    • K’Sheona Frazier
    • Shay Lagos
    • Joe Miraglia
  • How We Help
    • EEOC: Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation
    • OPM: Federal Disability Retirement
    • OSC: Whistleblower Protection
    • MSPB: Career Defense
  • Results
  • Reviews
  • Firm Blog
  • Contact

Call : 888-899-7284

Southworth PC | Attorneys For Federal Employees
888-899-7284
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Careers at Southworth PC
    • Our Mission, Values & Story
    • Shaun Southworth, Esq.
    • Lydia Taylor, Esq.
    • Ayesha Cotton, Esq.
    • Kaitlin Grant, Esq.
    • LaShanda Thompson, Esq.
    • Mark E. Attucks Sr., Esq.
    • Michael Royster, Esq.
    • Naseam Jabberi, Esq.
    • Octavia Crumpton, Esq.
    • Sadarie Hines-Mahens, Esq.
    • Tatiana Cooley, Esq.
    • Traci McCoy, Esq.
    • Abby Conine
    • Jessica Gregoire
    • K’Sheona Frazier
    • Shay Lagos
    • Joe Miraglia
  • How We Help
    • EEOC: Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation
    • OPM: Federal Disability Retirement
    • OSC: Whistleblower Protection
    • MSPB: Career Defense
  • Results
  • Reviews
  • Firm Blog
  • Contact
An Experienced Legal Team Passionately Protecting The Rights Of Federal Employees
  1. Home
  2.  — 
  3. Federal Employment Law
  4.  — 
  5. Supreme Court Holds LGTBQ+ Individuals Protected from Discrimination Under Title VII’s Sex-Related Provisions

Supreme Court Holds LGTBQ+ Individuals Protected from Discrimination Under Title VII’s Sex-Related Provisions

On Behalf of Southworth PC | Jun 15, 2020 | Federal Employment Law, Federal Sector EEO, Gender Discrimination, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (1964) |

Today, the Supreme Court held that an employer violates Title VII when it intentionally fires an individual employee “based in part on sex” because “homosexuality and transgender status are inextricably bound up with sex.”

No less, intentional discrimination based on sex violates Title VII, even if it is intended only as a means to achieving the employer’s ultimate goal of discriminating against homosexual or transgender employees. There is simply no escaping the role intent plays here: Just as sex is necessarily a but-for cause when an employer discriminates against homosexual or transgender employees, an employer who discriminates on these grounds inescapably intends to rely on sex in its decisionmaking. Imagine an employer who has a policy of firing any employee known to be homosexual. The employer hosts an office holiday party and invites employees to bring their spouses. A model employee arrives and introduces a manager to Susan, the employee’s wife. Will that employee be fired? If the policy works as the employer intends, the answer depends entirely on whether the model employee is a man or a woman. To be sure, that employer’s ultimate goal might be to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. But to achieve that purpose the employer must, along the way, intentionally treat an employee worse based in part on that individual’s sex.

This makes rationale sense and is widely understood to be true.

So, this is a good ruling on that point, which largely affirms the position that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has held on that point.

But our federal employment attorneys hope that other language in the decision will help other individuals from all protected classes because the “based in part” rationale provides additional language that will hopefully guide and illuminate when discrimination is actionable when being based “in part” on the protected characteristic.

This decision just issued a few moments ago, and like any similar Supreme Court ruling, our federal employment attorneys will be reviewing it to develop more ways to fight for our clients, including revising our processes as appropriate.

If you are interested in a consultation with one of our attorneys for federal employees, please call us today.

Recent Posts

  • OPM Reopened Comments. We’re Defending Your Right to a Fair Process.
  • Federal Employees Deserve a Fair Fight. We’re Opposing the EEOC’s Proposed Rewrite.
  • The Case That This Administration Is Targeting People with Disabilities, and What Federal Employees Should Do About It
  • Considering a Federal EEO Case? FAQs About the EEOC’s Proposed Changes
  • EEOC’s Proposed Changes: FAQs for Current Southworth PC Clients

Archives

Categories

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Our Team Is Standing By To Help You Get Justice. Do Not Wait To Reach Out.

Contact Southworth PC

Please note: Our firm only handles matters for federal employees. If you are not a federal employee, we will not be able to assist with your case.
Southworth PC

Atlanta Law Office 1100 Peachtree Street NE
Suite 200
Atlanta, Georgia 30309


Washington, D.C. Law Office 1629 K Street NW
Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20006


Dallas Law Office 12222 Merit Drive
Suite 130
Dallas, TX 75251

Phone888-899-7284

© 2026 Southworth PC • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

Review Us

Over 140,000 followers across all social media

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

Over 140,000 followers across all social media

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
Review Us

© 2026 Southworth PC • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw