Southworth PC | Attorneys For Federal Employees
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Careers at Southworth PC
    • Our Mission, Values & Story
    • Shaun Southworth, Esq.
    • Lydia Taylor, Esq.
    • Ayesha Cotton, Esq.
    • Kaitlin Grant, Esq.
    • LaShanda Thompson, Esq.
    • Mark E. Attucks Sr., Esq.
    • Michael Royster, Esq.
    • Naseam Jabberi, Esq.
    • Octavia Crumpton, Esq.
    • Sadarie Hines-Mahens, Esq.
    • Tatiana Cooley, Esq.
    • Traci McCoy, Esq.
    • Abby Conine
    • Jessica Gregoire
    • K’Sheona Frazier
    • Shay Lagos
    • Joe Miraglia
  • How We Help
    • EEOC: Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation
    • OPM: Federal Disability Retirement
    • OSC: Whistleblower Protection
    • MSPB: Career Defense
  • Results
  • Reviews
  • Firm Blog
  • Contact

Call : 888-899-7284

Southworth PC | Attorneys For Federal Employees
888-899-7284
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Careers at Southworth PC
    • Our Mission, Values & Story
    • Shaun Southworth, Esq.
    • Lydia Taylor, Esq.
    • Ayesha Cotton, Esq.
    • Kaitlin Grant, Esq.
    • LaShanda Thompson, Esq.
    • Mark E. Attucks Sr., Esq.
    • Michael Royster, Esq.
    • Naseam Jabberi, Esq.
    • Octavia Crumpton, Esq.
    • Sadarie Hines-Mahens, Esq.
    • Tatiana Cooley, Esq.
    • Traci McCoy, Esq.
    • Abby Conine
    • Jessica Gregoire
    • K’Sheona Frazier
    • Shay Lagos
    • Joe Miraglia
  • How We Help
    • EEOC: Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation
    • OPM: Federal Disability Retirement
    • OSC: Whistleblower Protection
    • MSPB: Career Defense
  • Results
  • Reviews
  • Firm Blog
  • Contact
An Experienced Legal Team Passionately Protecting The Rights Of Federal Employees
  1. Home
  2.  — 
  3. Federal Employment Law
  4.  — 
  5. Southworth PC Obtains Default Judgment for Client

Southworth PC Obtains Default Judgment for Client

On Behalf of Southworth PC | Jan 21, 2021 | Federal Employment Law, Federal Sector EEO, Firm News |

Southworth PC federal employment attorneys Shaun Southworth and Ianna Richardson have obtained default judgment for client after the Agency failed to develop a full and impartial record on their client’s case. The Report of Investigation was missing key information and the Agency failed to properly respond to show a cause order. Because of the Agency’s actions, the Commission determined that the proper sanction was a default judgment.

The Commission wrote:

“On October 30, 2020, Complainant filed a motion for default judgment, arguing that the circumstances of this case were more egregious than other cases where default judgment was imposed, noting the Agency’s noncompliance with the regulation and order to produce the complaint file, the Agency did not submit a declaration as required by the show-cause order, and addressing the Agency’s production regarding various deficient items. On November 5, 2020, the Agency emailed its response to Complainant’s motion but failed to upload it to the electronic docket as required by the Initial Processing Order. Additionally, the Agency’s response again failed to comply with the requirements for filings as ordered in the Initial Processing Order as it was not searchable nor bookmarked. Therefore, I find grounds not to consider the Agency’s noncompliant filing and I exercise my discretion initially not to consider it and find that the Agency has failed to justify its noncompliance. … In sum, I find that the Agency failed to comply with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.108(b). In review of the factors above and considering the dual purpose of deterring future non-compliance and equitably remedying Complainant, I find that the Agency’s non-compliance warrants meaningful and considerable sanctions. After carefully considering the circumstances of this case, I have decided to impose the following sanctions, which will effectively emphasize to the Agency the need to comply with the Commission’s regulations regarding investigations: 1. Issue default judgment in favor of Complainant. This sanction is narrowly tailored to the various deficiencies in the investigative record which effect nearly every element of Complainant’s claims.”

The federal EEO sector process is quite complex and our federal sector EEO attorneys help federal employees navigate the process from beginning to end. If you are a federal employee who believes they have faced discrimination or retaliation, then please feel free to contact us today.

Recent Posts

  • OPM Reopened Comments. We’re Defending Your Right to a Fair Process.
  • Federal Employees Deserve a Fair Fight. We’re Opposing the EEOC’s Proposed Rewrite.
  • The Case That This Administration Is Targeting People with Disabilities, and What Federal Employees Should Do About It
  • Considering a Federal EEO Case? FAQs About the EEOC’s Proposed Changes
  • EEOC’s Proposed Changes: FAQs for Current Southworth PC Clients

Archives

Categories

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Our Team Is Standing By To Help You Get Justice. Do Not Wait To Reach Out.

Contact Southworth PC

Please note: Our firm only handles matters for federal employees. If you are not a federal employee, we will not be able to assist with your case.
Southworth PC

Atlanta Law Office 1100 Peachtree Street NE
Suite 200
Atlanta, Georgia 30309


Washington, D.C. Law Office 1629 K Street NW
Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20006


Dallas Law Office 12222 Merit Drive
Suite 130
Dallas, TX 75251

Phone888-899-7284

© 2026 Southworth PC • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

Review Us

Over 140,000 followers across all social media

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

Over 140,000 followers across all social media

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
Review Us

© 2026 Southworth PC • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw